(emphasis added) The magazine article apparently thinks that "remake" and "adaptation" are the same thing. Lucas’ adaptation of Choderlos de Laclos’ classic takes place in modern day New York City." But don’t expect any wigs or tights in this flick.
#Dangerous liaisons gay download movie#
He’s wrapping up the most expensive and ambitious gay adult movie in history: a remake of Dangerous Liaisons, the x-rated version. "These days Lucas is about to play his biggest deck of cards yet.
The reference to Lucas's blog, a reprint of an article by Genre, states: Lucas will star along with Wilfried Knight, Richard Black, and Owen Hawk." Disputed information regarding remake/adaptation "Director/Performer Michael Lucas' most ambitious production yet is a XXX adaptation/update of the famous 18th-Century novel. Here is the text to which the reference refers: Chidom talk 14:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Adam Gay Video 1995 Directory reference The reference is not trying to sell anything it is where the studio has provided a synopsis of the film that it produced and released and, yes, has for sale. GunnarRene 17:13, 11 September 2006 (UTC) To the anonymous user who continues to delete the reference to Lucas Entertainment's retail store Durova 01:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC) Agreed on both counts. While it may be possible that the film producers cited the public domain novel instead of the copyrighted film for legal reasons, it would violate WP:NOR to advance that view without a verifiable source for the claim and it would violate WP:NPOV to exclude the production company's position. If editors who disagree with the company position find evidence to the contrary in other published sources that meet WP:V - such as a film review in an established magazine or newspaper - then that opinion may be cited alongside the manufacturer statement. Chidom talk 15:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC) Comments Īs I stated in the previous RfC about Michael Lucas's biography, manufacturer PR material about a product is generally acceptable as an encyclopedic source. The website has also been used as the source for the Plot section in the article. Specifically, the dispute involves whether the film in this article is an adaptation of the 18th century novel, as the studio claims, or a version of the 1988 film, which is unsourced information that continues to be inserted in the article. There seems to be a dispute as to whether or not a company's website is an accurate, verifiable source for the synopsis of one of its own films. Chidom talk 00:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC) Request for comments While Michael Lucas' should more properly be Michael Lucas' s, the original page was named correctly, as that is how the film is named. I was in error in moving the original page, Michael Lucas' Dangerous Liaisons, to this renamed page.